• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Integrated Care News

Integrated Care News

Powered by CFHA - News and media for professionals in integrated healthcare

  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Podcast
  • About
  • Map
  • Newsletter
  • CFHA

What Level of Integration is Your Practice?

August 12, 2021 by Matthew P. Martin Leave a Comment

3 minute read

Spreading the gospel of care integration is not for sprinters. To be sure, this game is for long distance runners. One of the beauties of integration is that individual clinics and care systems can use whatever model meets the needs of their patients and matches their available resources. This variability, though, also makes it challenging for systematically disseminating integrated care and measuring effectiveness outcomes.

But this is old news, right? Many industries, including healthcare, have shared quality metrics that can measure value and performance at any site across the landscape. These metrics offer a shared language and measuring stick for researchers, payors, and process engineers to use. They reduce variability and allow organizations to connect, share, and learn from one another (e.g., benchmarking).

In the field of behavioral health integration, the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) have made past efforts to develop certifications and lexicons, respectively, to reduce variability in our field.

One natural outcome of these past efforts has been the development and distribution of validated measures of integration. These measurement tools allow an organization to quickly benchmark their performance against external criteria.

The Practice Integration Profile is an example of a validated measure of behavioral health integration that practices can use to determine their current level of integration. To date, the PIP has been used by thousands of practices across the United States.

A recent publication by Juvena Hitt et al., (2021) from the Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings reports new findings on the PIP’s internal consistency, intra-rater consistency, and inter-rater consistency with a large new sample of practices. The findings demonstrate the PIP is a reliable measure of integration. Practices may consider using the PIP as both a quality improvement and health services research tool.

Hitt et al. recommend future research should examine the use of the PIP in improvement and research projects and develop a shorter version of the measure. As integration becomes more the norm than the exception, managers, payors, and researchers should adopt reliable and validated measures that make their jobs easier.

More information about the Practice Integration Profile Version 2.0 is available here: https://www.umassmed.edu/cipc/scholarship-research/practice-integration-profile-pip/

Link to the PIP 2.0 is here: https://umassmed.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2t5gZOBTkUlr5bL

References

Hitt, J.R., Brennhofer, S.A., Martin, M.P. et al. (2021). Further Experience with the Practice Integration Profile: A Measure of Behavioral Health and Primary Care Integration. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-021-09806-z

Macchi, C. R., Kessler, R., Auxier, A., Hitt, J. R., Mullin, D., van Eeghen, C., & Littenberg, B. (2016). The practice integration profile: rationale, development, method, and research. Families, Systems, & Health, 34(4), 334. https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000235

Mullin, D. J., Hargreaves, L., Auxier, A., Brennhofer, S. A., Hitt, J. R., Kessler, R. S., … & van Eeghen, C. (2019). Measuring the integration of primary care and behavioral health services. Health services research, 54(2), 379-389. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13117

Share this Article:

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Email

Category iconIntegrated Care News Tag iconresearch update,  measurement

Next Article: The Beauty of Numbers: How Mathematics Drives Scientific Inquiry
Previous Article: Is Yours a Learning Clinic?
Matthew P. Martin

About Matthew P. Martin

Matt Martin, PhD, LMFT, is Clinical Assistant Professor and research faculty at the Doctor of Behavioral Health Program at Arizona State University where he teaches courses on health care research, quality improvement, and interprofessional consultation. Matt conducts research on integrated care measurement, medical workforce development, and population health strategies in primary care. He is the current blog editor for CFHA and always looking for new writers.

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Footer

Contact

Collaborative Family Healthcare Association (CFHA)
11312 US 15-501 N.
Suite 107-154
Chapel Hill, NC 27517
info@CFHA.net

Key Contributors

Neftali Serrano, PsyD, CEO
Matt Martin, PhD, LMFT, Blog Editor
Leiana Edwards, Social Media
David Bauman, PsyD, Vlog Contributor
Grace Pratt, LMFT, Podcast Editor

What We Do

CFHA is a member-based, 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to making integrated behavioral and physical health the standard of care nationally. CFHA achieves this by organizing the integrated care community, providing expert technical assistance and producing educational content.

Join Today

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2022 Collaborative Family Healthcare Association (CFHA)

All Rights Reserved · Website by Tomatillo Design